For any concept to be useful in the practical, what will it do for me now, world of business, it must be defined in a way that is operational.
Few words are more fuzzy than spiritual or spirituality. The very concept seems to defy any concrete definition. Let me suggest that an ultimate defintion may be well beyond our capability, but developing a definition that is useful is not.
In some places spiritual capital is being equated with participation in formal religion. I find this unfortunate because my own experience does not lend credence to the idea that formal religion has any exclusive patent on spirituality; although for most, the discipline of formal religion is the training ground for spirituality. The Templeton Foundation is funding research and John Templeton has done an admirable job in his pioneering promotion of spirituality and its link to health, business and general well-bing.
Spirituality simply refers to our aspirations, our guidance, our connections not founded in the material world, but rather from some source, we regard as more noble. I think there are two key components of spirituality in the workplace that are of genuine value, assets, to the organization. The first is the degree to which members of the organization are committed to an ennobling purpose; and second, the degree to which shared values serve to guide ethical behavior.
A worthy purpose, the impulse to do something significant, to make a contribution to humanity, is the most fundamental form of motivation. Great leaders instill a sense of noble purpose in their followers and thereby create human energy.
Shared values, the discipline of adherence to a code of values within a group, is the basis of trust and sociability. Just as low-trust societies are economically handicapped, so to are low-trust companies.
To the degree that an organization can enable, support, or encourage a depth of personal morality and dedication to a noble purpose, it possesses spiritual capital.
Spiritual Capital may be recognized in the revised Maslow Hierarchy of Needs. Self-actualization (personal growth and fulfillment) was the former top need. In the 1990s, the concept of Transcendence, helping others to self-actualize now occupies the top slot. Transcendence may be a measure or symptom of spiritual capital for an individual.
Then how do individuals with “spiritual capital†share with others to build measurable organizational spiritual capital?
Forms of organizational capital may to come from different cultures of academic inquiry, different worldviews and different basic presumptions about reality. Traditional building blocks of business administration courses of study (management, finance, accounting, marketing, etc.) do not delve very far into social, spiritual, human and even technical/process areas. An approach to systemically defining organizational capital writ large may be to consider creating new business knowledge along with more effective qualitative and quantitative ROI metrics. My personal tool for building organizational spiritual capital emerges from some faith-in-action approaches.
It will be interesting to expand this conversation.
Larry, the entire issue of a) what is spiritual capital, specifically; and b) how can it be measured, are both issues in their infancy. In my new book I have attempted a definition of spiritual capital (social and human capital are easier and more commonly accpeted). Some, have equated spiritual capital with membership or participation in religious organizations. I have difficulty with that definition for several reasons. Also, for the the purpose of improving business organizations, I feel it is important to separate the concept of spiritual capital from formal religion (which is not to deny that religious participation may enhance one’s personal spiritual capital or spirituality).
I have defined spiritual capital as having two major components: first, the dedication to an ennobling worthy purpose; and second, a disciplined adherence to a set of moral values that are derived from a source of authority outside oneself. In my book (the new one) I have identified five critical success indicators for each of these, at three levels – the organization, the team and the individual.
In doing this I don’t claim that my definitions or indicators are in any way authoritative, or “right”. Rather I offer them as a starting point, or as a contribution to a dialogue that I suspect will go on for a long time.
Larry Miller