Older Blog Posts

Leadership Lessons from Alexander to the Ukraine

Leadership Lessons from Alexander to the Ukraine

As a student of leadership, it is impossible to observe the conflict in the Ukraine and fail to see the obvious contrast in leadership styles between the leaders of the two sides and the profound impact of those leadership styles.

In 333BC Alexander the Great led his army on the Plains of Issus against the larger and presumably more powerful Persian Army of King Darius. Before the battle commenced Alexander rode his horse up and down the line of his Macedonian soldiers speaking to them directly about the glory of their cause. Alexander then took his position at the front of the Cavalry on the right flank and led them across a river and up a bank into battle. At first it didn’t go well. Alexander retreated to then take a position personally at the front of the infantry and led them on foot into battle. Finally, he returned to his “Companions”, his elite cavalry and led their charge on horseback into the center of the Persian line, forcing the retreat of King Darius. As soon as the Persians could see that their king had retreated, they all began their retreat. Alexander was wounded on every limb of his body. Here is where the Empire and the mythology of Alexander was formed.

 Alexander is the archetype, the model of the heroic leader. Every well-educated general is taught the lessons of Alexander. Napoleon imagined himself to be like Alexander. General Patton believed he was the re-incarnation of Alexander. Each sought to replicate the love affair between leader and led, the affection and affiliation that the leader creates when he demonstrates his love for his army, and his army returns that love as we now call loyalty. The will to sacrifice, even die, for a cause is generated when the leader demonstrates his own willingness to sacrifice and speaks to his followers of the greatness of their cause. Great leaders are never distant and aloof, but always close to those who fight, if not physically, then in spirit.

I suspect these lessons are not taught in KGB school.

Many have thought that there was no possibility that the Ukrainians could defeat the much more powerful army of the Russians. But history his filled with David and Goliath stories, the weaker defeating the stronger. In every case, it is leadership and the will to win that turns the battle. In Vietnam, where I served, we had superior numbers, superior technology, superior equipment. We controlled the skies and the sea. Ho Chi Minh is quoted as saying “You will kill ten of my men for every one of yours that I kill. But it is you who will tire of it.”

There is little else one needs to know about the contrasting Russian and Ukrainian leadership styles than the image of Putin sitting at the end of a very long conference table in a gold ornate marble room with his two top generals seated all the way at the other end of the table: and the image of President Zelensky, in military clothing, visiting hospitals and speaking intimately with his soldiers and citizens. One is the picture of aristocratic alienation and aloofness, the other the picture of affection and affiliation. One is not only isolating himself from his comrades but is isolating his entire country from every other country. The other is creating affection with his comrades and is creating commitment to his cause from the majority of civilized countries.

In my course on Transformational Leadership, I offer nine principles of transformational leaders. Here’s a very quick review of just four of them in light of the current contest.

The Purpose Principle: Ukrainian soldiers and citizens have no confusion about their purpose. They are passionately committed to preserving their independence as a democratic nation. Russian troops are confused as to their own mission, many believing it was a training exercise. Desertions and retreat are not a surprising result of a lack of purpose.

The Integrity Principle: Leaders do not maintain loyalty by lying! Putin and his spokesmen have been dishonest at every stage of this conflict, claiming they were fighting Nazis and liberating Ukraine, claiming they were not going to invade and ten doing just that. It is impossible to believe anything they say. This makes negotiations extremely difficult when any settlement will have to be enforced with might and not trust.

The Unity Principle: Unity is strength. When Alexander conquered Persia he decided to wear Persian dress and married one thousand Greek soldiers to one thousand Persian women. This may seem absurd in our age, but at that time it was a powerful statement of unification. He made several top generals in the conquered army his own generals. Zelensky has done an incredible job of unifying his cause with the cause of the NATO countries and his people, who had their internal differences before, and are now completely unified in their support of their leader.

The Humility Principle: Autocratic leaders develop a belief in their own superior wisdom and judgment and dismiss those with contrary views. This is a prescription for failure, whether in the military or in business. Truly great leaders are psychologically secure enough to listen to and respect differing opinions. The spark of truth emerges from the clash of differing opinions. Humility encourages others to tell you the truth. The opposite is hubris which is very often the cause of defeat. Hubris is what caused Gen. Robert E. Lee to attack cemetery ridge at Gettysburg despite his second in command, Gen. Longstreet, an engineer who had computed the death toll that would result from the number of canons on the ridge and the length of the march in an open field. Longstreet advised that it was a mathematical certainty that their losses would be devastating. Lee didn’t listen.

The Empiricism Principle: Every good manager I have known has had a love for the facts. Much of lean management is based on a thirst for the data, analysis of the data, and respect for the data. Empiricism and is the principle of the scientific mind. It is somewhat amazing that an experienced intelligence officer as Putin was, failed to accurately gather the facts and respect those facts. There was no evidence of Nazis in control of the Ukrainian government. He apparently didn’t even know the fact that Zelensky was of Jewish background. Putin’s passion for his own vision of a restored empire was more important than a respect for the facts.

You can study the leadership of your own company through the lens of these principles and consider the lessons of history that might guide your own choices.

.

ESG and Principled Leadership

The Inevitable Consequence of Closed Systems

There are many uncertainties in leadership and world affairs. But there is one thing that is certain. When a leader surrounds him or herself only with those who agree, submit, or are bullied into withholding independent views, it is only a matter of time before that leader drives off a cliff of his own making. It has always been the case. The age of maturity of the human race will be an age in which no individual is empowered, on their own, to make important decisions and fall victim to the hubris of ego. The effect of this illness we now see too clearly in front of us.

Five Capacities for Unleashing Collective Intelligence: A Team Inventory

Five Capacities for Unleashing Collective Intelligence: A Team Inventory

The following is a repost of an article by Natasha Naderi which I think is very good and very relevant to my readers. And, yes, Natasha is my daughter who is working in Beijing, China.

Natasha can be reached at natasha@emerge-global.co and her website is https://emerge-global.co/

 

When a group of diverse and intelligent minds comes together, amazing things can happen. Conversations can be almost magical — leading to greater innovation, the discovery of products we never imagined, and solutions to complex problems that no one could solve alone. Team decision-making creates exponential learning, unified action, greater energy and momentum, and so much more.

However, the unfortunate reality is that teams frequently fail to live up to this ideal. Have you participated in a “team decision” where only one or two people did the thinking and the rest just went along for the ride? Or maybe you’ve been in a meeting where some seemed more concerned with getting credit for ideas, rather than finding the best solution?

An HBR article by Sunstein and Hastie[1] explains how social and reputational pressures frequently lead groups to make poor and damaging decisions. In fact, in many cases, often “[g]roups do not merely fail to correct the errors of their members; they amplify them.”

Giving decision-making authority to a team can be risky.

What collective capacities need to be present in order for a higher level of innovation and wisdom to emerge? And how do we develop those capacities?

Our experience and research developing teams suggests that there are five key team capacities that need to be present for this innovation and emergence to occur. They are: 1) Compassionate Honesty; 2) Diversity of Input; 3) Independent Investigation; 4) Ideas Belong to the Group; and 5) Unified Commitment to Act.

Let’s explore why each is important and how you can develop them.

Five Capacities for Collective Intelligence

1. COMPASSIONATE HONESTY

Collective intelligence requires a commitment to discovering ‘the best solution’ or ‘the truth’. Truth can only be discovered through honesty. In the absence of honesty, the best solutions and most creative ideas will remain hidden from us.

You might be wondering why “compassionate” honesty? When we hear a difficult yet honest message from someone who is uncaring and rude, it is easy to dismiss it. On the other hand, when the speaker is compassionate and caring, we are much more likely to hear what they have to say, explore that different perspective, and seek to understand even the most challenging suggestion.

2. DIVERSITY OF INPUT

Research consistently shows that diverse groups of problem solvers consistently outperform homogenous groups — even when those homogeneous groups are made up of the best and brightest individuals.

“As individuals we can accomplish only so much. We’re limited in our abilities. Our heads contain only so many neurons and axons. Collectively, we face no such constraint. We possess incredible capacity to think differently. These differences can provide the seeds of innovation, progress and understanding.” [2]

Further strengthening the case for diverse teams, a 2019 McKinsey study found that that companies in the top quartile for gender diversity on executive teams were 25 percent more likely to have above-average profitability than companies in the fourth quartile. And in the case of ethnic and cultural diversity, the top-quartile companies outperformed those in the fourth, by 36 percent.[3]

3. INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION

Surprisingly, experiment after experiment, shows that humans tend to conform to the group, MORE than we tend to stand up for what we think individually. This phenomenon, known as “groupthink” has been noted as the cause of many decision-making disasters in the world, such as the Space Shuttle Challenger Disaster.[4]

At times, we might conform to the group due to fear of being different. At other times, it may be that we simply have not taken the time, done the research, nor given the topic enough thought to come up with our own independent view. It is often just easier to go along with whatever others think is best.

Collective intelligence only arises when we first individually investigate the situation with our own set of data and from the lens of our own unique experience and understanding, and then come together to aggregate our collective view. This was one of the key findings in the book Wisdom of Crowds by James Surowiecki.

“See with thine own eyes and not through the eyes of others.”[5]

4. IDEAS BELONG TO THE GROUP

When our ego is attached to our ideas, we work hard to defend those ideas — even when they are wrong. When, on the other hand, we contribute those ideas to the group, it is much easier challenge them, test them, and mold them into something much better than the original.

Just as fire is used to test and refine gold, similarly, testing and challenging ideas, purifies and perfects them.

Furthermore, if we believe in a “field of consciousness”, then giving ideas to the group makes perfect sense. This concept maintains that there is field, which is a source of inspiration and creativity, and it is equally available to all. Through developing our personal consciousness, we can more readily access this field. If ideas come from a field of consciousness, then they do not belong to us, as individuals. We are merely vessels, though which these ideas travel.

5. UNIFIED COMMITMENT TO ACT

Action is the most important phase of decision-making. When we act with unified conviction, we generate a powerful force that supports our collective success. Furthermore, unified action enables us to clearly see the results of our decision, so that even when the idea is imperfect, we can continuously improve our decisions and actions.

Sharing dissenting views after a decision is made, undermines the decision, weakens the team as whole, and sets up the team for failure. Decision-making is meaningless if we fail in executing those decisions.

After there has been honest consideration of all the diverse views, we sacrifice our personal preference for the sake of the group and move into action with unity and strength.

Develop Your Team’s Collective Intelligence

What signs can you look for, to see if your team possesses these capacities? How do you know when more practice is needed?

Below is a team inventory you can use to gauge how your team is doing. Simply ask your team members to rate how they are doing on each one, from a scale of 1–10, where 1= Poor and 10 = Fantastic. After everyone has individually rated, have a discussion on how you are doing and what you can practice more, to increase your collective intelligence.

Are you curious about how you can develop your team’s collective intelligence? Feel free to reach out for a pdf of this inventory and/or to explore more together.

 

 

The following courses are related to leading a team toward creative wisdom.

Team Facilitation Skills
The Growing Investment Value of Principled Leadership

The Growing Investment Value of Principled Leadership

I watch the enrollment trends of my seventeen courses and sometimes those trends prove very interesting. About a year ago I noticed a dramatic increase in enrollments in my course on Transformational Leadership. I noticed that a major source of this increase was from one of the largest accounting/consulting companies.

One of the fastest growing areas of consulting is “ESG” (Environmental, Social and Governance) consulting. Why? Because major institutional investors are now making investments based on a corporation’s ESG score. Almost every company is now reporting its activities and plans in environmental responsibility, social impact, and ethical governance. At the heart of ESG is a fundamental understanding of values, principles, ethics that guide the leaders of companies.

Since my earliest writings I have been promoting the importance of developing a strong value system in a company. All cultures are built on the strength of a value system and they all decay and decline when common values are eroded. One doesn’t have to spend too much time watching the news to see the dangers present when we lose faith in those values that create unity among a population. The lose of values, the disintegration of social unity, always precede the material/economic decline of a civilization, country or company.

I think the growing concern among corporate leaders about the dangers of social disintegration and the growing investment payoff of improved ESG performance are increasing the relevance of Transformational Leadership. It is worth your time and essential to the well-being of your company that you focus and clarify your own corporate value system and ESG performance.

ESG scores are typically based on the following:

Environmental:

  • Climate Impact and Strategy
  • Water and Resource Depletion
  • Greenhouse Gas Emissions
  • Deforestation
  • Waste Disposal

Social:

  • Health and Safety
  • Working Conditions
  • Employee Benefits
  • Diversity and Inclusion
  • Human Rights
  • Impact on local communities

Governance:

  • Ethical Standards
  • Board Diversity & Structure
  • Stakeholder Engagement
  • Shareholder Rights
  • Pay for Performance
  • Transparency and Disclosure
  • Anti-corruption measures
Your Path to Self-Management – the Hybrid Organization

Your Path to Self-Management – the Hybrid Organization

Having recently completed my course on the Hybrid Organization it has occurred to me how essential it is that employees develop effective self-management skills. From the culture of control dominant in the 20th Century manufacturing organization to the knowledge-work economy of the 21st Century there has been a gradual path from top-down to bottom-up, from a culture of control to a culture of self-control and self-management. In between has been the focus on small groups, the work team, that is still the essential unit of organization.

The pandemic lockdown of 2020 greatly accelerated that transition as most corporations are now wrestling with the design of a post-Covid organization and work practices. While some executives such as Jamie Dimon of JPMorgan are insisting that employees return to the office, he may be creating a competitive disadvantage as employees report they are willing to change jobs if required to return to the old in-office requirement.

It is very clear to me that the future will be dominated by flexible organizations with flexible (hybrid) work arrangements. But what are the key skills that will enable that organization to be successful? I think there are two and they are not about technology. First, effective team leadership and facilitation to assure rapid problem-solving and continuous improvement; second, promoting the skills of employee self-management, enabling bottom-up management of performance.

Several surveys, including my own which you can find here, point to the belief among employees that they were more productive working from home and had higher job satisfaction. This is a benefit to all concerned.

The challenge now is to both design this hybrid/flexible organization and to increase the capability of team members to manage their own performance in a remote setting. I believe that there has been almost no attention paid by corporations to the development of self-management skills. Why not? I think the answer is that the assumption has always been that you are managed by yourself, but by your manager. Hence, billions of dollars spent on management training, and none devoted to building self-management skills. I don’t know whether this will change soon, but the logic of it seems obvious to me. For this reason, I devoted about a third of my course to employee self-management skills. It is a subject on which I would love to have input and feedback.

You can find the complete survey results here.

The following is a checklist of sixteen self-management practices that I suggest as a self-assessment in my course. What would you add to this list? I would love to hear your suggestions.

 

 

I have a place of work at home that I can control and be in a work mindset.

I have a regular time at which I enter my place of work.
I have a regular order of work such as first read and respond to emails, then begin work on projects, etc.
I assure that my place of work is not cluttered with distractions and is in a regular order when I am finished for the day.
I know the scorecard, what and when we are to accomplish milestones, for my team.
I set my own short-term goals for my own work accomplishments.
I set my own long-term goals for my work accomplishments.
I share my goals with some family or friend who can provide encouragement.
I have some form of visual display that indicates my progress toward my goals.
If I live with family members or friends, I have reached agreements regarding the use of my time, when I can be with them and when I must be left to my work.
Breaks and exercise are essential to healthy work. I have a regular schedule to exercise (walk the dog, etc.)
I get help from a team member with whom I agree to share my work and work schedule so that I get feedback and encouragement from that team member.
I reward myself for either intermediate or long-term goal achievement.
I schedule time with my manager to receive his/her feedback and coaching.
When I receive feedback or coaching from my manager, I write down actions I can take to improve my own performance and I share those actions with my manager.
When I commit to any action to improve, I write that down and visually display a note to remind myself of that action.

 

 

The Hybrid Organization is Here and Now!

The Hybrid Organization is Here and Now!

Post Covid We Enter a New Age of Hybrid, Flexible Work System Built on Trust and Self-Management,

In the year 2020 we experienced the most massive social experiment in human history. In every company, in every country, on every continent we suddenly went from the necessity of “going to work” to the necessity of NOT going to work. There are lessons from this unintended experiment that will change our models of work forever. We are now entering an age of hybrid organizations with a flexible mix of at home and onsite work. Now we must figure out how to make this successful. That is the subject of this course.

Every organization must redesign its own work, teams and relationships to take advantage of the lessons that we can both perform much of our work from home and experience increased job satisfaction and productivity. Even the U.S. Federal Governments has accepted the new reality of hybrid organizations and is engaged in creating new rules and a new culture.

This course is based on many years of designing organizations to be self-managing. It not only addresses management’s responsibility to redesign systems and structures and management need to adopt new skills and style; but also, the employee’s responsibility to manage their own work, space and motivation and to become great team members taking ownership of their own performance. Please have a look at the free introductory lectures.

The course includes action learning assignments and recommends a blended learning model with learning teams and coaching. It also includes 30 downloadable case studies, exercises, and other resources.

The Social Responsibilities of Corporations and Their Leaders

The Social Responsibilities of Corporations and Their Leaders

The Social Responsibilities of Corporations and Their Leaders

Or, why you should not just “shut up and dribble!”

Business is not only about making money. It is about creating wealth – not merely personal wealth but the aggregate wealth of society. Peter Drucker said that business has only two functions – innovation and marketing. Innovations in technology, services and products are exactly what creates wealth.

As a leader in your business market, you are responsible for developing conscious knowledge of your larger purpose and your impact on society. From Henry Ford to Jamie Dimon our corporate leaders have taken a stand on the social issues impacting their customers and country. In each of my courses I have attempted to create a foundation in worthy purpose, and most specifically in my course on Transformational Leadership I propose a system of corporate values.

Two things happened this week that prompt my writing today. First, Mitch McConnell, Republican leader of the Senate “warned” (his word) that “corporations should stay out of politics.” The irony was thick. He quickly followed up with “I am not speaking about donating to political parties, they should continue to donate.” A politician once told LeBron James, after he spoke out on a social issue that “he should just shut up and dribble!” I have some advice for Mitch McConnell. I would not advise telling LeBron James to just shut and dribble; and I would not “warn” the CEO’s of J.P. Morgan, Coca-Cola, or Delta Airlines to stay out of politics. I have worked with CEOs of major corporations for many years. To put it in simple language, these are tough guys (or gals). You simply do not “warn” them to do or not do anything. They will not react well. You might suggest, advise, ask… but not warn! The Republican party has long argued that corporations have the same rights as individual citizens to freedom of expression and to support political causes. They are, and will continue to do so.

The second thing that happened this week is that corporations and their leaders took an assertive stand on several critical social issues, in particular the issue of voting rights. Many chief executives write an annual letter to shareholders and some of these letters are expressions, not only of the past year’s performance and future business plans, but of the greater values of the corporation and its leaders. This week Jamie Dimon, CEO of J.P. Morgan-Chase published his annual letter to shareholders, and it is worth studying for its implications for the role of corporations in our society. You can download it here.

If you scroll down to page 10 of his letter, past the financial performance section, you will find an outline of what he chooses to discuss in the remaining 66 pages. I will point you particularly to the first and second section: The Corporate Citizen: The Purpose of a Corporation; and Lessons from Leadership. While it is all worth reading, let me point to a couple highlights under each.

The Corporate Citizen:

When you read Dimon’s discussion of shareholder value he makes clear that he is not just speaking of short-term profits returned to shareholders. The following are a few quotes regarding Dimon’s understanding of Corporate Citizenship:

  • “The problem with the American public’s impression of “shareholder value” is that too many people interpret it to mean short-term, rapacious profit taking – which, ironically is the last thing that leads to building real, long-term shareholder value…. A company is like a team. We must do many things well to succeed, and, ultimately, that leads to creating shareholder value.”
  • “JPMorgan Chase takes an active role in large-scale public policy issues. We are fully engaged in trying to solve some of the world’s biggest issues – climate change, poverty, economic development and racial inequality – and the accompanying features that follow describe the extensive efforts we are making.”
  • “JPMorgan Chase introduced The Path Forward in October 2020, committing $30 billion over the next five years to address the key drivers of the racial wealth divide, reduce systemic racism against Black and Latinx people, and support employees. The firm has made tangible progress to date.”

Lessons from Leadership:

I think we learn to be effective leaders by observing and modeling the behavior of other successful leaders. In my courses I attempt to present many models of highly effective leaders. It is worth hearing from this successful leader what he considers to be some key lessons currently.

  • “A good decision-making process involves having the right people in the room with all information fully shared (all too often I have seen precisely the opposite). There is also the need for constant feedback and follow-up. A bad decision-making process kills.”
  • “It is helpful to try to separate and examine actual raw data versus calculated numbers.”  (This is the equivalent in bankers’ terms of the lean principle of “go-and-see” or Go to the Gemba.)
  • “While I am fanatical about detail and multi-year analysis, it’s important to be cautious about its application… Bureaucrats can torture people with analysis, stifling innovation, new products, testing and intuition.”
  • “As companies get bigger and more complex, leaders need to be more like coaches and conductors than players. If CEOs are running a smaller business, they can literally be involved in virtually everything and make most of the decisions – they often rely on traditional command-and-control tactics. This approach does not work as companies get bigger – the CEOs simply cannot be involved in every major decision.”

There is a lot more good advice in the letter, and I recommend that you read it in its entirety. It is a good lesson in both corporate citizenship and leadership. We need all corporate leaders to be socially aware and responsible for more than their short-term financial performance, but for their contribution to the creation of the aggregate wealth of society. Do not just “shut up and dribble!”

Larry Miller

Invest in Yourself! Build Your Brand Now!

Let’s get to the point. Udemy’s Black Friday sale is on and now is the time invest in courses at the lowest price and which will build your own personal value in the marketplace, your brand equity.

Let me make two recommendations that you may not have considered. Most of those who will receive this are managers or change agents and you do not think of yourself as a “salesperson.” But… please consider this. Those who rise in organizations, those who become partners in the law firm, principles in the consulting firm, or directors/VPs in any corporation are not only skilled in their function. They know how to bring in the business. They know how to build long-term trusting relationships. That is the essence of Consultative Selling. It is the low anxiety way to sell in the true spirit of service. Nothing will enhance your value more than consultative selling skills.

One of the most critical, and too often missing skills, in our organizations is the ability to think through and redesign the system and structures that determine human behavior and performance. High performing, lean organizations, are designed! They are not an accident. My course on Strategy Execution is a comprehensive course on designing your organization’s systems and structure – its culture – to achieve strategic improvement. If you can do this, you are among the most valued members of your organizations team.

Now is the time to build your skills with any of the following courses, and now is the time to capture them at the lowest possible cost!

  1. Sales Skills Training: Consultative Selling Master Class
  2.  Lean Leadership, Lean Culture & Change Management: Designing the System of Continuous Improvement  
  3. Leading Virtual Teams – A Quick Course
  4. Coaching Leaders for Success
  5. Giving and Receiving Feedback – A Quick Course
  6. Moral Leadership: The Principles of Transformational Leaders
  7. Management Skills: Essentials for the New Manager
  8. Leadership and Life Cycles
  9. Team Facilitation: The Core Skill of Great Team Leaders
  10. Motivation: The Science of Motivating Yourself and Your Team
  11. Lean Problem-Solving for Team Members and Team Leaders
  12. Team Leadership – Team Leadership Skills Master Class
  13. Strategy Execution – The Agile/Lean Way

Leadership and What Made “America Great” in The First Place

  1. Intellectual Curiosity and Reason:

I am reading Steven Pinker’s book Enlightenment Now in which he goes over the transformations in thought brought about by the Enlightenment thinkers of the eighteenth century. Our Founding Fathers – Jefferson, Madison, Paine, etc. were the intellectual children of the enlightenment thinkers (Hobbs, Locke, Rousseau). The leaders who established our greatness were intellectuals and spoke several languages. The Jefferson library is a reflection of the workings of his mind. They knew history and thought deeply about the flow of civilization.

Pinker says there were four themes of the enlightenment: reason, science, humanism, and progress. What our founders did was to attempt to make those ideals the foundation of a system of government, which had never been done before. No King, no Divine Right, no adherence to religious dogma that characterized every prior government and no religious wars that had burdened Europe for centuries. Freedom of speech, press, and religion as foundational thoughts that were the essence of enlightenment thinking. As imperfect as their creation was, they were only human, it nevertheless established the expectation that you had the right to equal treatment under the law. It didn’t establish the reality of those expectations, but there would be no “good trouble” if those expectations were not established. The American story is the story of striving to achieve them.

It is an odd thing to say, but if you feel that you are not treated equally and you are upset about that, you owe that emotion to the expectations authored by Jefferson, Madison and Paine. If you lived in sixteenth century Europe the expectation of equal treatment would never occur to you and you would be spared that feeling of injustice. Cognitive dissonance is the root of progress.

2. Servant Leadership:

George Washington, who did not want to be president and did not campaign for it, established the ideal of the leader as servant of the people, unlike the reverse that had been true for millenniums.  At the Constitutional Convention at which he was clearly the most revered man, he sat at the back of the room and only spoke twice and did not take sides in debates, which were many. Both times he spoke it was to remind the delegates to collect their papers. How is this then leadership? Sometimes leadership is to be present, to listen, to encourage, and to be a force of example rather than a dominant force. Sometimes strength is silence.

In my opinion every citizen should be required to read, no study, Washington’s Farewell Address in which he voiced his two greatest fears for the new nation: entanglement with and influence by foreign powers, and what he termed the “spirit of party” that he already saw emerging around Hamilton and Jefferson. He always encouraged unity and feared disunity. Every good general knows that you are strong when united and weak when divided.

If we want to make America great again, we must again have leaders who view themselves as servants and not as the center of greatness themselves, leaders who unite and do not divide.

3. Thomas Paine and the Age of Reason:

As Washington’s troops crossed the Delaware in a blizzard, some barefoot, hungry and freezing, he had the captains of each boat read aloud passages from Thomas Paine’s Common Sense. It was the inspiration for the revolution. And then Paine wrote the Age of Reason in which he literally tears the Bible apart, pointing out contradiction after contradiction, and repeated genocidal madness allegedly in God’s name. Paine was a Deist, one who believes in God but finds the perfection of God in His own Creation, nature, and believes that the Bible and the religions of the day were an insult to God’s own perfect work. Imagine if you will, a modern politician having the nerve to write a blistering critique of the Bible. At the same time Jefferson was re-writing the Bible himself. Could a politician survive such a thing today? But, at the founding of this country the belief in reason, science and humanism were the foundation of what did make us great.

Thomas Paine was a man of incredible intellectual courage. After the American Revolution he wrote The Rights of Man in defense of the French Revolution, left for France and served in legislature and even in French prisons until rescued by James Monroe, then Ambassador to France. He was more dedicated to the ideas of constitutional government and natural rights than he was to any country. He influenced the course of government in the United States, France and Britain. He was a leader of thought and a revolutionary of ideas. This too is a form of leadership.

4. Communitarianism:

We were not made great by rugged individualists doing their own thing. The pilgrims and other odd religious groups who came to these shores relied on their collective power, their community. And, when the Europeans moved west, they did so in groups that supported one another. Farmers worked together to build barns, to share seed, and to create collective marketing organizations. The term “farmers cooperatives” became common in the mid-west states. Communitarianism built the social fabric of the nation. Communal social effort has always been our strength. It was not the heroic charismatic leader, but the ability to enable to the collective power of community.,

5. Public Education:

Free and compulsory government funded education created the middle class in America. This was an American invention. In the early 1800’s, beginning in New England, public schools were established. Without public education only the wealthy could attend school, cementing the divide between an upper and lower class. This government funded social service expanded to the idea of land grant colleges and university so that today every state has a University of Georgia and a Georgia State or Georgia Tech universities. This was all established by our government in the shared believe that educated citizens were required for a democracy and for economic progress. One might call this a great experiment in “social engineering.”  If one believes that government funded, and even required, services is a dictatorship of socialism than you can thank this socialism for creating this country as we know it.

I’ll stop. Those are some of the things that leaders did that I believe did make America great. As we consider our own standards of leadership, our expectations of leaders, perhaps there are some lessons for us in this history.

The National Crisis of Trust: Every Leader Must Do Their job!

 It is the job of leaders to create trust between leader and led, between the institutions of governance and those who are governed. Udemy recently asked me for comments on this topic that were just published in FastCompany Magazine.  My friend, Payam Zamani, tech entrepreneur and CEO of OnePlanet also just published an article on the national crisis of trust and the danger of the decline of this nation. 

For fear of mixing business and politics I have been hesitant to speak out on the current crisis in this country, which is much larger than the Covid19 pandemic. It is the crisis that will determine whether this country (the U.S.) remains a great nation. We have been great, precisely because we have been open to immigration and because we have embraced alliances around the world, promoting democracy and human rights, the values of this country. We have, in the past been united around the core values that did make this country great – opportunity, equality, democracy and justice for all – but, greatness requires vigilance and now is the time for us all to be vigilant. 

Trust is the social glue that unites a cultures. All cultures are either in the process of integrating or disintegrating, creating cultural cohesion or dissension, and economic growth has proven to be correlated with high levels of trust and economic decline correlated with the absence of trust (see Francis Fukuyama’s book Trust). Trust is social capital and the World Bank has recognized the essential nature of building social capital to achieve economic development. The same is true within a corporation as it is in nations. High levels of internal trust result in high levels of creativity and problem solving. We create and expand in an environment of trust, and the reverse is true. We retreat when we fear the outside world, our competitors, and that retreat is followed by disintegration of brand equity. Leaders create trust and expansion; anti-leaders create fear and retreat.

Arnold Toynbee studied the rise and fall of 23 civilizations and among his conclusions was that great civilizations are never defeated by the external barbarians, but always by internal disintegration and what he called the “loss of self-determination.” They decline when they are at their most powerful and most wealthy, when they reach a “condition of ease.” 

This is also a failure of leadership. Leaders emerge from the culture but they also shape and give direction to the culture. The first job of leaders is to create unity of purpose, common cause, common challenge and unite people in shared effort. Leaders must define our ennobling purpose, and challenge us to arise to that purpose. Purpose creates unity. If we don’t select leaders who will do that we will continue to disintegrate and decline. When leaders spread distrust they are essentially engaged in an act of collective suicide. 

What can a leader do to build trust within his or her company (or country)?

  1. What is our worthy purpose? Why are we here? What will be our (or my) legacy when we are done? Defining our personal purpose and the purpose of the group of people whom we seek to lead is the essential cornerstone of leadership and growth. The President of the United States, like the president of a company, must define the purpose not only of their administration, but of the country at large. I always understood that our purpose was not only within, but was expansive – to promote democracy, free enterprise, human rights to the entire world. If we believe in these values we must speak up! We must promote them to the world and encourage countries and leaders who do the same. 
  2. Take Ownership of Performance: Can you image the president of a company openly disparaging his own company, disparaging the human resource department, the marketing or manufacturing and causing employees to not trust their own company? Impossible. He would be fired. The job of the president of a company or country is to make things work! It is a simple idea. But, a company president is judged by the performance of that company. To perform, all the pieces (engineering, marketing, etc.) must work together, united in both process and principles. Trust builds performance and distrust destroys performance. 
  3. Fact Based Transparency: Some leaders believe in their own words, their theories, more than they believe in facts. Great executives are obsessed with understanding the facts. They study, they read, they listen to others with more expertise in different subjects. They are good students first, good executives second. Then they openly share the data, good or bad, and confront reality with action. Sharing the data and explaining the data to employees in frank and honest terms. Particularly in this time of the pandemic crisis, every employee understands that their company is being impacted by disruptions in markets and supply chains. Share the data and be absolutely frank in explaining what the data is telling you and how you are responding. This creates trust and loyalty in followers. 
  4. Be absolutely humble! We don’t trust people who feel a need to congratulate themselves. Admit mistakes. You will gain respect for engaging in self-reflection. Arrogance is the enemy of learning and destroys trust. Humility is an attitude of learning that gains trust. 
  5. Talk Continuous Improvement: In this age every employee understands that there are no absolutes – no perfect process, no final destination in performance. Talk about the journey… where we have been and where we are going and what we are doing to get there. Employees want to know that their leaders are themselves engaged in continuous improvement. Be the model! If employees hear you talk about your efforts to continuously improve, they will trust you more and they will be motivated to engage in continuous improvement. 
  6. Give Credit to Others: Always share credit for any success with others. I want to be on your team if I see you sharing success with your team members. And, your team will then take responsibility for failures and for continued improvement. 

 I know the above comments have swung back and forth between business and larger societal issues. Principles that matter apply to leadership of self, company and country in almost identical ways. I tried, in my course on Transformational Leadership to capture the most important principles that I feel are essential for leaders who will build trust. It is the essence of leadership. 

 

Team Leadership Curriculum & Certificaton

Essential Skills for the New Manager

Categories

Recommended Reading