Both governments and companies suffer under illusions of power… the intoxication of the material world and the dismissal of the power within the heart and mind.
Flash back to Vietnam. In 1966 I was getting bored. I was serving in the 513th US Army Intelligence Corp in Oberussel, Germany. Vietnam was beginning to happen. It was where the action was, the excitement, the focus of the news. So, at the age of twenty, I volunteered to go.
It is perhaps hard for most Americans today to recall the mindset of the times. The threat of global communism, the domino theory, the assumptions of power. We saw Vietnam as an incredibly small, backward country. We had all the aircraft carriers, missiles, a huge army fending off the Soviet Union and China. What did Vietnam have? Jungles. My office was in a building directly under the flight path into Tan Sanut Airfield, then the busiest airfield in the world, as three fighter jets, side-by-side took off and landed every minute. It was an incredible display of power.
Ho Chi Minh said “You will kill ten of my men for every one of yours I kill. But, it is you who will tire of it.” General Patton said “Every war is the same. Tools change, but war is the same. You defeat the soul of the enemy, man.” They both knew something about power.
We lost fifty-eight thousand men and it is probable that the Vietnamese lost ten times as many. Yet, they won and we lost.
We should have learned something about the nature of power. At its peak we had more than five hundred thousand soldiers in Vietnam. We built massive air fields and ports. None of it mattered.
Whether there is a valid parallel to what is happening today in the Middle East we can all speculate and I won’t debate it here. But, what is clear is that to the degree that we do not understand the realities of power, we will lose. We are fighting the wrong war. The great irony of Vietnam is that now we are investing in Vietnam and businesses view it as a new market, source of labor, economic opportunity. The Vietnamese want IPODs, blue jeans, and wireless Internet access. We lost the military war. We are winning the war of attraction. The soft-power war.
A couple of years ago Joseph S. Nye, the Dean of the Kennedy School of Government published Soft Power, a book that should have been read by more leaders in both business, but in particular, in government. Nye defined soft-power as “getting others to want the outcomes that you want” or, “the ability to shape the preferences of others.”
Soft power is the critical element of business success today. Money and muscle do not sell product, attract the best people, or produce breakthrough innovations. Nor do money and muscle win the hearts of Pakistani villagers, Afghan farmers, or Iraqi children. Neither does it win the affection of teenager digital download devotees or website surfers.
Another way of defining soft-power is social and spiritual capital. Just as one has money in the bank that may attract earning, social and spiritual capital attract the heart and mind, the affection, the loyalty, and trust of both the market and employees.
How many classes, meetings, seminars, have you been to on building social or spiritual capital, or soft-power? Most likely none! We are primitive in our understanding and skills at building these forms of capital. A hundred years from now both business and political historians will look back and ask, “what were they thinking?”
Nye defined soft-power as “getting others to want the outcomes that you want”
One of the military definitions of leadership is, “Getting other people to do what you want them to do, while making them believe they are doing what THEY want to do”. As such, Nye’s thoughts are not that original, just the context is different.
However, what I think is more important in this perspective is the clear expression in long term investment that some politicians and some CEOs can not perceive. They fail to see past the end of this year’s budget deliverables or share dividend. Many modern companies and governments (today countries have to be run as companies) run the risk of not only failing to invest overseas for enhanced security, but also in their own countries for the long term development of their own raw materials (people). A lack of government investment in social and educational development at home may save their budget on a year to year basis, but will lead to significant problems in the long term.
Richard, I agree with you. See my previous, somewhat tongue-in-cheek, proposal for National Strategy. Imagine if the U.S. (or other countries) devoted significant attention to building social capital. We are so consumed by the material thing (whether consumable products, or airplanes and bombs) that we completely fail to see the source of real power…which is in social relationships, trust, dedication to a worthy purpose, etc.