<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Power and Influence 2006</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lmmiller.com/blog/the-new-capitalism/2006/07/07/power-and-influence-2006/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lmmiller.com/blog/the-new-capitalism/2006/07/07/power-and-influence-2006/</link>
	<description>The Search for Cultures of Quality and Commitment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 14:53:13 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Larry Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.lmmiller.com/blog/the-new-capitalism/2006/07/07/power-and-influence-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-1146</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 15:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lmmiller.com/blog/the-new-capitalism/2006/07/07/power-and-influence-2006/#comment-1146</guid>
		<description>Richard, I agree with you. See my previous, somewhat tongue-in-cheek, proposal for National Strategy. Imagine if the U.S. (or other countries) devoted significant attention to building social capital. We are so consumed by the material thing (whether consumable products, or airplanes and bombs) that we completely fail to see the source of real power...which is in social relationships, trust, dedication to a worthy purpose, etc. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard, I agree with you. See my previous, somewhat tongue-in-cheek, proposal for National Strategy. Imagine if the U.S. (or other countries) devoted significant attention to building social capital. We are so consumed by the material thing (whether consumable products, or airplanes and bombs) that we completely fail to see the source of real power&#8230;which is in social relationships, trust, dedication to a worthy purpose, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard John</title>
		<link>http://www.lmmiller.com/blog/the-new-capitalism/2006/07/07/power-and-influence-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-1145</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 15:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lmmiller.com/blog/the-new-capitalism/2006/07/07/power-and-influence-2006/#comment-1145</guid>
		<description>Nye defined soft-power as â€œgetting others to want the outcomes that you wantâ€ 

One of the military definitions of leadership is, â€œGetting other people to do what you want them to do, while making them believe they are doing what THEY want to doâ€.  As such, Nyeâ€™s thoughts are not that original, just the context is different.
However, what I think is more important in this perspective is the clear expression in long term investment that some politicians and some CEOs can not perceive.  They fail to see past the end of this yearâ€™s budget deliverables or share dividend.  Many modern companies and governments (today countries have to be run as companies) run the risk of not only failing to invest overseas for enhanced security, but also in their own countries for the long term development of their own raw materials (people).  A lack of government investment in social and educational development at home may save their budget on a year to year basis, but will lead to significant problems in the long term.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nye defined soft-power as â€œgetting others to want the outcomes that you wantâ€ </p>
<p>One of the military definitions of leadership is, â€œGetting other people to do what you want them to do, while making them believe they are doing what THEY want to doâ€.  As such, Nyeâ€™s thoughts are not that original, just the context is different.<br />
However, what I think is more important in this perspective is the clear expression in long term investment that some politicians and some CEOs can not perceive.  They fail to see past the end of this yearâ€™s budget deliverables or share dividend.  Many modern companies and governments (today countries have to be run as companies) run the risk of not only failing to invest overseas for enhanced security, but also in their own countries for the long term development of their own raw materials (people).  A lack of government investment in social and educational development at home may save their budget on a year to year basis, but will lead to significant problems in the long term.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
